Search for: "STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA! "
Results 921 - 940
of 9,508
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2022, 11:22 pm
And the class-action lawyers are then the ones who really invest in it, and who stand to gain something: they're the economic center of gravity as opposed to a service provider.Mr. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
It continued after she moved to California, initially through a string [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
[So holds a California appellate panel, by a 2-1 vote.] [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 7:45 am
It is up to the franchisor to do its due diligence. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Both California and federal statutes protect employees and job applicants from religious discrimination. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 12:59 pm
As in years past, California’s lawmakers were unwilling to stand up for the individual right to sue over privacy violations, and both bills took a beating as they went through the committee process. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
It is also important to note that these evolving court decisions focus on standing and harm associated with data breaches. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 3:37 am
Pelosi made to 911 shortly after the intruder woke him up. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:13 pm
(California), TikTok PTE Limited (Singapore), Bytedance Ltd. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:07 pm
And I am based in while I’m currently in Pasadena, California. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 1:30 pm
Supreme Court granted the petition of Slack Technologies to have the court take up the question of the plaintiff’s standing to pursue ’33 Act liability claims against the company. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in making sure state courts rightly interpret state constitutions (just pause for a minute to think about how weird from a federalism standpoint that very concept sounds) is not just “made up” and thus anti-originalist, it also flouts more than a century of clear teachings by the Court that state courts are the master interpreters of state law (Green v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 5:53 pm
Because the case was decided on a Motion to Dismiss and the discussion does not go item by item through the plaintiff’s allegations it isn’t clear whether this decision will stand up to an exploration of the facts. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 2:52 pm
The California Supreme Court thought that was fine; unanimously, no less. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 12:59 pm
The tobacco industry succeeded in putting the law up for a statewide popular vote, known as Proposition 31; California voters approved the ban in last month’s election. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 5:18 pm
Apple ended up before Judge Alsup in the Northern District of California. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:35 pm
Alternatively, if this Court’s understanding is right, the California Legislature is free to modify the scope of statutory standing under PAGA within state and federal constitutional limits. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
That one was dismissed in the Northern District of California never to be seen again. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 4:07 pm
The school’s purpose was to shift the timing of field use from weekday mornings and weekend afternoons to weekday evenings, which would significantly expand existing nighttime use of the stadium from about 40-50 evenings per year (using temporary lights) to up to 150 evenings per year. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
” This is worth reinforcing because the pro-censorship forces have lined up against this common-sense principle. [read post]
