Search for: "STATE v MILLER" Results 921 - 940 of 5,892
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age… [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:20 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Miller, 570 F.3d 868, 885-89 (7th Cir.2009) (discussing split of authority on issue; holding that RLUIPA does not subject state officials to suit in their individual capacities). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Amanda Frost
 The court held only that a state court sitting in habeas was required to give retroactive effect to the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 2:45 pm
" When such individuals die before the CCA renders its opinion in the case, see generally United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005]: The Belmarsh CaseRichard Clayton9. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:57 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
CCJ Auto Transp., 59 So.3d 179 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), because the claimant’s acceptance of the employer’s offer (the last act necessary to form the contract) occurred in Florida, jurisdiction was in Florida; and Miller Contracting Co. of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Ray Dowd
Assignments of Copyrights, Declaratory Judgments, Federal Question Jurisdiction, Dismissal of State Law ClaimsFrost v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:06 pm by Ray Dowd
Dowd Find Ray Dowd at Dunnington Bartholow & Miller LLP Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 6th Ed. 2011) by Raymond J. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:27 pm by Rumpole
 And so it has come to pass that a young assistant state attorney, who frequented an aforementioned establishment,  ( one would expect in an attempt to satisfy some prurient interest, see, e.g, Miller v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 12:10 pm
Category: Recent Decisions Body: SC19105 - Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 7:37 am
  In lieu of granting application for leave to appeal, the Court of Appeals denied Lenawee County’s appeal for the reason that under Miller v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:59 am by Jon Sands
  The panel reiterated that it was bound by United States v. [read post]