Search for: "STEWART v. STATE" Results 921 - 940 of 2,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, even if a plaintiff establishes the first prong, the plaintiff must still demonstrate that he or she would have succeeded on the merits of the action but for the attorney's negligence (see Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; McCluskey v Gabor & Gabor, 61 AD3d 646, 648; Peak v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C., 28 AD3d 1028, 1030-31; see also Brodeur v Hayes, 18 AD3d 979; Raphael v Clune, White & Nelson, 201 AD2d… [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 7:16 am by Adam Winkler
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
But perhaps the Chief Justice’s highest-profile case was United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And concluded that what Potter Stewart's "concurring Brothers" demonstrated in 1972 was true. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:10 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
The one case on which the Defendant relied was United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]