Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2022, 9:20 am
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 7:46 pm
In the result, based on my examination of the Record in this application, I am not satisfied that a disposition that is fair and just to both parties on this issue can be made on the existing The Supreme Court of Canada stated in Doré v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
In Fraser v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am
Moreover, it sets up a strange set of circumstances where an expressive work could be considered protected speech for purposes of a Lanham Act federal false endorsement claim, but not for a state right of publicity claim, even though the two claims are highly similar, a fact that the Ninth Circuit itself acknowledged more than 20 years ago in Waits v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:30 pm
In Bates v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:00 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided to consider Timbs v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:13 pm
At yesterday’s oral argument in Skinner v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Litigation makes strange bedfellows, especially litigation about bedfellows. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
Cases from your El-Masri v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
For California employers, the Morris holding creates a strange current state of the law where arbitration agreements with class action waivers may be enforceable in state courts under the Iskanian ruling, but may not enforceable in federal court under the Morris v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm
(Warren Distributing Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm
By 1941, the pro-New Deal Court took this line, saying in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:09 am
Strang at para. 14; b. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960) (friend's apartment); United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:05 pm
In South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 3:43 pm
V. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Tritek Telecom v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court's 2006 eBay v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 6:02 am
Lastly, I want to remark on how strange it is that I came to be in these circumstances. [read post]
