Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 921 - 940 of 6,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 8:11 pm
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has released an opinion disposing of summary judgment motions on a claim that a minority shareholder's sale of shares is a breach of fiduciary duties where that sale destroys the corporation's subchapter S tax status. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm by Ailyn Cabico
These proposed “investor protection” amendments are intended to enhance the SEC’s ability to evaluate market changes, the nature of advertising used by issuers, the steps taken by the issuer to verify that all investors were accredited and the intended use of the proceeds of the sale. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:42 am by John McFarland
” Plaintiffs argued that this $18-per-barrel charge had to be added back to Devon’s gross price under paragraph 3(c). [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 1:34 pm
But beer is also a tipple close to my heart, and so I was pleased to learn that a brew I like will be available for sale in Ontario’s Liquor Control Board stores, and not just on draught at pubs that are hard to find. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 2:40 am by Sherica Celine
C-PACE Financing: Exploring the Benefits and Risks Discussion of Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) financing legislation available in nearly 40 states, and considerations for borrowers and lenders. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 7:14 am
After complex litigation between the parties about an allegedly simple failure to give (an arguably unnecessary) notice, Vice Chancellor Glasscock, in Vintage Rodeo Parent LLC, et al v Rent-A-Center, determined that R-A-C need not go through with the sale even though the parties (at the time) had appeared to understand that the end date would be extended and had continued to work on satisfying the other closing conditions. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
The Inner House stated that the objective of s28 is limited in scope: it was intended to enable the court to correct any clear and quantifiable economic imbalance that might have resulted from cohabitation and that it could not be said that the sale of the appellant’s house took place “in the interests of” the respondent – the proceeds of sale had been used for the appellant’s purposes and to meet joint living expenses. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Members B and C bring damages suit against Member A for breach of fiduciary duty of disclosure, alleging that Member A secretly was negotiating sale of lease when he bought out Members B and C. [read post]