Search for: "Settle v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 15,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
The case is entitled Hines et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:16 am
In 1972, in Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 12:21 pm
“We have always said that Intel’s business practices are lawful, pro-competitive and beneficial to consumers, and we are pleased this matter has been resolved,” Melamed stated.The case is State of New York v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:41 pm
In Prime Financial Services, L.L.C. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
In 2008 Sate Farm and Hood settled and the Court dismissed the case. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
(relisted after the Dec. 4, Dec. 11, Jan. 8, Jan. 15 and Jan. 22 conferences) [NB: the parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle and the court now appears to be holding the case] Lombardo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:06 am
As noted in Part III of this series, we are going to examine the reasoning behind the Nebraska Supreme Court determining joint and several liability ceases when one of two liable parties settle with a claimant as set forth in Tadros v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
No Rubber StampsIn the case of Moore v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:26 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:08 am
I now shamelessly crib from a lower court decision by Justice Walter Tolub in 2006 against Comptroller Hevesi and the State (citations have been omitted):It is well settled that the Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over actions for money damages against the State, State agencies, or State officials acting in their official capacities in the exercise of governmental functions. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:27 am
Reckitt stated that the misrepresentation was material. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:50 am
In Bang v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:25 am
City of Chicago (08-1521) — incorporation of Second Amendment against the states Hui v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 8:42 am
The post Sandy Hook v [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
This court should reject this approach and instead apply settled standing principles. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am
Mozes v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:04 am
Wills v. [read post]
