Search for: "Stark v. Stark" Results 921 - 940 of 2,487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2013, 10:01 am by Florian Mueller
Stark of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware just entered an order referring a handful of Nokia patent cases against HTC and ViewSonic to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Choice-of-law clauses pose even more difficult questions when the state with the greater interest in the lawsuit has a strong public policy concerning non-competes.A stark illustration of these choice-of-law rules comes from the recent Fifth Circuit case of Cardoni v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:51 pm by Larry
Mainly because I just read Links Snacks, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Jeffrey Vlasek
  We've noted a number of such cases in recent weeks but take, for example, the recent decision of Cordy v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 6:43 am
v:* { behavior: url(#default#VML) } o:* { behavior: url(#default#VML) } .shape { behavior: url(#default#VML) } v:* { behavior: url(#default#VML) } o:* { behavior: url(#default#VML) } .shape { behavior: url(#default#VML) } With the tragic cold-blooded murder of Rabbi Gabriel Noach Holtzberg and his wife, Rebbetzin Rivka Holtzberg with eight other Jews, whose names have not been revealed as of this writing, we come to the… [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:33 am by Adam Chandler
Writing for AOL Politics Daily, Andrew Cohen predicts that the Court is likely to rule in favor of former Attorney General John Ashcroft in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, explaining that he doesn’t “think the Court would have accepted the review if it wanted to endorse the 9th Circuit’s view and allow former executive branch officials to face trial — even in the stark circumstances presented by al-Kidd and his lawyers. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
Given the stark impact the new rules have it is not impossible to see how a different conclusion might have been reached. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
McDonald’s have appealed, but the loss of protection for one of the most renowned names in fast food should serve as a stark reminder that, without proof, no one is famous in the eyes of the EUIPO. [read post]