Search for: "Starks v State" Results 921 - 940 of 1,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
"I Never Thought This Would Happen, and Certainly Not So Fast!"
28 Apr 2015, 7:05 am by Matthew Harwood
That trend has snowballed since 2013, when the Supreme Court struck down the core of the Defense of Marriage Act in the ACLU’s United States v. [read post]
American Civil Liberties Union Blog of Rights - https://www.aclu.org/blog
Partner Departures and Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group: Does California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600 Void Any Partnership Provision that Restricts a Departing Partner’s Right to Compete?
20 Apr 2015, 11:37 am by O'Rielly & Roche LLP
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
California Partner Departure Law - http://www.partnerdeparturelaw.com/
Afterbirth: The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Young v. UPS Leaves Many Questions Unanswered
19 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Deborah L. Brake
In this case, Young v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
In Velasquez v. Funes de Velasquez, 2015 WL 1565142 [E.D. Virginia ] [El Salvador] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
         In Velasquez v. [read post]
A Child is Missing - http://joelbrandes.blogspot.com/
What ever happened to comity?
16 Apr 2015, 12:36 pm by Gregory Forman
For the third time in less than two months the South Carolina Supreme Court has directed the Court of Appeals to depublish one of its opinions–this time on April 9, 2015 in the case of State v. [read post]
Blog on South Carolina Family Law - http://www.gregoryforman.com
Partner Departures and Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group: Does California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600 Void Any Partnership Provision that Restricts a Departing Partner’s Right to Compete?
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by admin
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
California Partner Departure Law - http://www.partnerdeparturelaw.com/
Partner Departures and Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group: Does California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600 Void Any Partnership Provision that Restricts a Departing Partner’s Right to Compete?
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by admin
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
California Partner Departure Law - http://www.partnerdeparturelaw.com/
Exoneration Inflation and a Minor Correction on Debra Milke
10 Apr 2015, 10:08 am by Kent Scheidegger
Co. v. [read post]
Crime and Consequences - http://www.crimeandconsequences.com/crimblog/
California law nixes settlement that could limit doctor’s ability to practice
10 Apr 2015, 6:14 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Kozinski filed a separate dissenting opinion (Golden v. [read post]
WKL&B WOrkDay Blog - http://www.employmentlawdaily.com/index.php/blog
Assault in the Third Degree...cont
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Clark v Jeter, 486 US 456, 461 (1988). [read post]
New York Criminal Lawyer Blog - http://www.nycriminalattorneyblog.com/
Unlawful Possession of an Air Pistol ...cont
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Clark v. [read post]
New York Criminal Lawyer Blog - http://www.nycriminalattorneyblog.com/
No females among 1600 drilling rig entry-level jobs hired in two years; EEOC suit proceeds
30 Mar 2015, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
However, these statements were not direct evidence of discrimination (EEOC v. [read post]
WKL&B WOrkDay Blog - http://www.employmentlawdaily.com/index.php/blog
Alternative Business Structures Proposals or Solving the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem
30 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Therefore there is nothing in the analytical literature that states that they can solve the problem. [read post]
Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca
Scared Shitless Into Pragmatism: Ready For Hillary -- The Far Lesser Evil
20 Mar 2015, 11:51 am by Lovechilde
  Start with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
Fair and Unbalanced - http://fairandunbalancedblog.blogspot.com/
An Atypical View of Causation and Harm from South Carolina
20 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
Wilson v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Cell Phone Records Can Show Where You Sleep and Where You Pray
10 Mar 2015, 7:29 am by By Nathan Freed Wessler, Staff Attorney, ACLU Speech, Privacy & Technology Project
In this case, United States v. [read post]
American Civil Liberties Union Blog of Rights - https://www.aclu.org/blog
The Unprecedented Expansion of School Surveillance Authority Under Cyberbullying Laws
8 Mar 2015, 4:53 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In June 2014, the Supreme Court recognized in Riley v. [read post]
beSpacific - http://www.bespacific.com/
Supreme Court’s Catt judgment ignores reality of surveillance and seriously undermines privacy & protest rights
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm by Jag
John Catt has indicated that he will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights – historically the court has been far stricter on the requirement of accordance with the law and therefore far less willing to allow the state wide discretionary powers where privacy and surveillance are concerned, resulting in a series of rulings against the UK – see Malone v UK (1984), Hewitt v UK (1992), Liberty & Others v UK (2008), S &… [read post]
Law is War - http://lawiswar.wordpress.com/
Coercion of the States in King--and the federalism canons
5 Mar 2015, 11:52 am by Marty Lederman
In the wake of the oral argument in King v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A Physician May Violate Anti-Kickback Laws Even Without Steering Patients To A Specific Provider.
4 Mar 2015, 10:34 am by Todd Rodriguez
See U.S. v. [read post]
Physician Law - http://physicianlaw.foxrothschild.com/