Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 921 - 940
of 12,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
United States or Printz v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am
In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 7:22 am
Woodford, in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in 2002 that the press and public have a First Amendment right to view executions. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
See, e.g., California v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:20 am
It's pretty straightforward, given the Ninth's prior rejection of an attack on the similar federal statute in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:13 am
The California Supreme Court just posted Troester v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:48 pm
This definition is drawn from Section 16 of Title 18 of the United States Code. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
And let's not forget that California still has the chance to declare itself in support of the 35 other states' brief when it makes its own submission at a later stage with a view to state UCL.Epic's appeal is very much alive. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 1:45 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
The Supreme Court of the United States Blog today presents an enlightening analysis of Monday's decision in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm
But in the wake of the court’s June decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:58 am
Kennedy, Jr., United States District Judge. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 6:47 am
In Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
By Matthew Hinks The California legislature has declared the availability of housing for every Californian to be a matter of "vital statewide importance." [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Millett will argue on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of California. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 2:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:10 am
United States v. [read post]
