Search for: "State v Blake"
Results 921 - 940
of 995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2007, 11:20 am
US v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 8:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:53 am
However, I find it hard to square with his vote in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
New Jersey lawyer Steven Sanders, who has long been thoughtfully examining the issue of how to deal with Blakely errors, sent me this thoughtful comment about Justice Scalia's curious work yesterday in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:13 pm
US v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:20 pm
Stewart, in which the Court declined to rule on the question of whether the sentencing decision in Blakely v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:15 am
The Court's per curiam ruling in Burton v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:29 am
Here is Lyle's early report:[T]he Court declined to rule on the question of whether the sentencing decision in Blakely v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:03 am
In a second decision, the Court declined to rule on the question of whether the sentencing decision in Blakely v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 1:30 pm
Despite that decline, the number of criminal appeals in 2006 surpassed by more than 25% the number of filings in the years before the Court's decision in Blakely v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
Booker and Blakely v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:07 pm
greatly impact the application of Blakely in the states (details here), and Claiborne and Rita could (and likely will?) [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 10:01 am
State of Indiana. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
Dec. 28, 2006) (available here) (7-2 decision): The Washington State Court of Appeals "reversed the trial courts, holding that under Blakely v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:22 am
State; Kolb v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:21 pm
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
Here is the abstract:Soon after the Supreme Court in Blakely v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 10:35 am
He also argues that the restitution and registration orders were im-posed absent jury findings required by Blakely v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 3:06 am
To sample two of Judge Rosenblatt's decisions in which he infused his dogged pursuit of historical background information, see two of my favorites: Blake v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 8:49 am
" Read more about the Burton appeal here in The National Appellate Journal, which writes that Burton asks: the Supreme Court the following questions: (1) Is the holding in Blakely v. [read post]
