Search for: "State v. Brain " Results 921 - 940 of 2,675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm by SJM
However, it would appear to be insufficient on the strength of this judgement for a Court to ignore new evidence at the warrant stage and to state, for example, that the main proportionality issues had been dealt with in the course of the possession claim.Jarnea and others v Romania (31/5/12)The applicants were owners of properties which had been let to tenants under agreements concluded with the State. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm by SJM
However, it would appear to be insufficient on the strength of this judgement for a Court to ignore new evidence at the warrant stage and to state, for example, that the main proportionality issues had been dealt with in the course of the possession claim.Jarnea and others v Romania (31/5/12)The applicants were owners of properties which had been let to tenants under agreements concluded with the State. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
The best chance to save the petitioner was the brain damage, and the jury and state courts were not persuaded. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:09 pm by Steven M. Gursten
Carrier, I’d like to run a comment by C-PAN regarding the McCormick case and why Kreiner v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 12:59 pm by Leslie Sammis
Any cases currently pending in County Criminal Division “V” will be transferred to Circuit Criminal Division “V. [read post]