Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 921 - 940
of 22,155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
In Sprague v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm
Overview: In Eslinger v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 3:55 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 5:39 am
In the case of Tribuzio v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 9:31 am
The plaintiff-employee may attempt to prove discrimination through circumstantial evidence by satisfying the United States Supreme Court’s burden-shifting framework set forth it its decision in McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:51 am
On February 27, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
Strike one.Plaintiff relied on McNeil v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:23 pm
I mentioned yesterday that I understood CAAF had granted review in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:01 am
Eighth Circuit concludes the names of the prior convictions (for possession of crack cocaine and as a felon in possession of a firearm) were relevant to show the prior felonies qualified under the statute and were marginally prejudicial since the jury could learn there was more than one felony and given the burden of the government to show the nature of the felony, in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 1:10 pm
Byrd v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:03 am
In the Enron prosecution, the defendant failed to meet his burden to show "that the government was responsible for the unavailability of the declarants"; Fifth Circuit also notes an issue of "first impression": "whether, to invoke Rule 804(b)(6) properly, a party must make this evidentiary showing with material independent of the hearsay itself," in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:11 pm
The petition of the day is: Runyon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 4:30 am
APPEALUnited States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
Any burden is also justified by the state's compelling interest in safe management of its maximum security prisons.In Oliverez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
The district court did not expressly state whether Gladding or the government had the burden of proof on the motion. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:09 pm
The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision overruling its long-standing physical presence rule in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
Gobeille v. [read post]
