Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 921 - 940 of 13,580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2022, 5:18 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
This approach was not, however, maintained in the Design Regulation as finally adopted.EUIPO and Easy Sanitary Solutions appealed to the CJEU (Joined Cases C-361/15 P and C-405/15 P). [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:31 am by Sander van Rijnswou
(See Reasons, point 2.2.3.)As a consequence of the foregoing, any infringement of requirements going beyond the principle mentioned in the portion of the catchword 1 of R 8/15 quoted above is not subject to scrutiny by the Enlarged Board in review proceedings under Article 112a(2)(c) EPC. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 3:06 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) The Chief Land Registrar v Silkstone & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 801 (14 July 2011) TE v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 811 (14 July 2011) Barclays Bank Trust Company Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 810 (14 July 2011) FM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Civ 807 (14 July 2011) Hussain & Ors, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:33 am
Bell v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 36 AD3d 1129 Roy Bell was a probationary elementary school physical education teacher employed by the New Paltz Central School District. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:39 pm by GuestPost
We are pleased to welcome this, the final in our series of rapid responses to the judgment in A, B & C v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:26 am by sally
du Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Tele2 Polska sp zo o (now Netia SA) Case C-375/09; [2011] WLR (D) 149“A national competition authority, having examined whether there was an abuse of a dominant position pursuant to its own national law and pursuant to article 102FEU of the FEU Treaty (ex article 82EC of the EC Treaty), was not entitled to take a decision stating that there had been no breach of article 102FEU of the FEU Treaty. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (DA & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 17-19 Jul 2018. [read post]