Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 921 - 940
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2020, 11:23 am
Supreme Court made its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:31 am
“Domestic Relations Division actions may be transferred from suburban municipal district court locations to the Richard J. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:14 am
Okada v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm
As noted above, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has not addressed the recent FMCSA’s Preemption Determination. [read post]
28 May 2020, 1:47 am
Lenovo trial on Friday, the Mannheim court's other patent-specialized division--Presiding Judge Dr. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm
In this post, I consider the constitutionality of the border closures. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:53 am
Employment Division v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 5:03 pm
California Issues the First Published State Appellate Decision Affirming Dismissal of Securities Act Claims on the Pleadings While the dismissal rate of Securities Act cases filed in state court has been historically dismal, especially in comparison to those filed in federal court, the California Court of Appeal, First District’s recent decision in City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:05 am
In a recent unpublished Appellate Division decision, Weinman v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm
He reaffirmed the Court of Appeal’s finding in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373 that the defendant’s state of mind is irrelevant to the tort of misuse of private information. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
While I agree with some of his larger points, he draws some surprising conclusions. [read post]
9 May 2020, 10:33 pm
(As best as I can tell, the case was not appealed.) [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 10:19 am
However, two recent state appellate court rulings may not bode well for punitive damages in future cases. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:16 am
The Lower Court’s Ruling The case was assigned to Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jennifer G. [read post]
3 May 2020, 9:26 am
App. 2009) But, in Illinois, a husband simply “forgot” to mention all of his previous marriages and the appeals court found that was not sufficient fraud to grant an annulment. [read post]
