Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 921 - 940 of 4,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, ex rel. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:52 am
 Pix credit hereThe ICJ Registry issued a Press Release on 6 March 2024 stating that "South Africa today filed an urgent request with the Court for the indication of additional provisional measures and the modification of the Court’s Order of 26 January 2024 and decision of 16 February 2024 in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (SouthAfrica v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 8:14 am by David Gans
In both cases, state legislatures — one dominated by Republican lawmakers, one dominated by Democratic lawmakers — took advantage of sophisticated new data and computer technology to lock up the political process. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 11:50 am
  Further, the ability to present that defense at the state court (because of the "domination" of her by someone else) wasn't due to state action, and therefore Washington v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
“HB20 may make using dominant social media platforms so distasteful they become virtually unusable for most of the public. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
And the Board has conceded that it needs supervision, since it is dominated by market participants. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Carol Swain - Guest
  Institutional failure is driving the entrance of state and local governments into an area normally dominated by the federal government. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Burwell opinion breaks sharply with the heretofore dominant conservative interpretive jurisprudence championed by Justice Scalia. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:08 am by John Wileur
The Court conveniently ignored this issue by stating that the agreement restricted competition “by object”. [read post]