Search for: "State v. Douglas" Results 921 - 940 of 3,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 7:29 pm
Back to the Gross issue, the Sixth Circuit just issued an opinion in an ADEA case earlier this month stating: "Thus, when a termination arises as part of a work force reduction, the fourth element of the McDonell Douglas test is modified to require the plaintiff to provide 'additional direct, circumstantial, or statistical evidence tending to indicate that the employer singled out the plaintiff for discharge for impermissible reasons.'"Schoonmaker v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 2:17 pm
Summary of Decision issued December 15, 2008Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: State, DOT v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 10:55 pm
Douglas's opinion in Griswold v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 10:11 am
Warren, Brennan, and Fortas subscribed to the Memoirs variation; Black and Douglas asserted that obscenity was constitutionally protected; Harlan held to his Roth view; and Stewart thought that both federal and state governments could suppress “hard-core” pornography. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 7:54 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Paul Finch, No. 101,136 (Douglas)State appeal (question reserved)Janine A. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Murphy v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:36 am by Anthony Zaller
Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515 (1946), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
 Douglas McDonald is a solicitor with Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers, Sydney, and a former exchange student at the National Law School of India University. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 1:49 pm by Neil Siegel
Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
” The dissent, however, believed that no reasonable jury could find that the agency’s assertion that it didn’t hire her due to her inexperience was pretexual (Walsh v. [read post]