Search for: "State v. Duty"
Results 921 - 940
of 32,072
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 10:13 am
The Mississippi Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment (Smith v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:18 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Even if the alleged misconduct was ministerial and not discretionary in nature, [Claimant] has failed to show a special duty (see id. at 199, 202-203; Hephzibah v City of New York, 124 AD3d 442, 443 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 903 [2015]). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Even if the alleged misconduct was ministerial and not discretionary in nature, [Claimant] has failed to show a special duty (see id. at 199, 202-203; Hephzibah v City of New York, 124 AD3d 442, 443 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 903 [2015]). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
Not only would EPA have authority to address that state, but EPA would have a duty to do so. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:32 am
The case is entitled Blanco v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
” In SEC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 4:29 pm
Bohon v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
That is, after all, what the text of the Impeachment Clause actually states. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
However, the court contested this, stating that, just because this is an uncustomary rule, this does not signify that it is extraneous. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:39 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in Great Lakes Insurance SE v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am
“Simply stated, no inquiry is not a reasonable inquiry. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
Past cases, such as Kamen v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm
I structure my inquiry as an analysis and exposition of all three sentences of a paragraph from Marbury v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Desserts, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
In their default and usual role, State Active Duty (SAD) status, soldiers are exercising state functions at the request of the state government and are generally governed by state law. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Tornetta et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Tornetta et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:04 am
Trump-v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner commenced the instant Article 78 proceeding to review the Executive Director's determination.* The Appellate Division, citing Ippolito v TJC Dev., LLC, 83 AD3d 57, ruled that the ALJ properly granted the Justice Center's motion to preclude Petitioner from relitigating the issues of whether she had a duty and breached her duty to provide adequate medical care to the Service Recipient as "The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel… [read post]
