Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,969
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2016, 7:58 am
Greg Abbott and Rob Natelson for the American Legislative Exchange Council, have been promoting the idea of getting two-thirds of the states to call for an Article V convention to propose amendments to the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 5:24 am
The underlying case, Husain v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
Jacobs, 38 Misc. 781, 78 N.Y.S. 833; People ex rel. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
Fortunately this particular matter has been considered and largely rejected by the UK courts (see Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2001] EWHC/Ch/25 ) As mentioned, there is quite a bit of case law on the public interest issue, and those interested in it may find it helpful to read a summary by Jacob J(as he then was) in his first instance hearing of Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland case (see paras [24-34]). [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 12:05 pm
Wall Street Journal Law Blog: Texas Can Deny Tax Breaks to Films it Doesn’t Like, Appeals Court Rules, by Jacob Gershman: Texas has leeway under the First Amendment to deny tax breaks to films deemed insulting to the state, a federal appeals court ruled [Machete Prooductions LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:42 am
Citing the 2015 Florida Supreme Court decision in Sanislo v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Such was the story in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:22 am
That 2-1 ruling is now the subject of a debate at the Court of Appeals, which has decided not to hear the case en banc.The case is Turkmen v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 2:37 pm
Supreme Court in McCleskey v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:26 am
In Generics v Lundbeck [2006] EWCA Civ 1261 its interpretation was described as difficult (per Jacob LJ paragraph 8). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Jacob J. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
” State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 7:07 am
A federal court in Virginia recently held in Travelers Casualty and Surety Company v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
As Annsley explains in this post, that litigation started back in 2012 and focuses on an exciting Rovi's patent - European Patent (UK) No 0, 862,833 - which relates to interactive video communications and viewer-controlled selection of programming information.* Jeremy Phillips' words of warning- and some further thoughtsStarting from Jeremy's words at the 10th anniversary JIPLP program, Neil reflects on the state of IP in the universities. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 8:55 am
Jacobs. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 2:49 am
Rather, a defendant must aim “to permanently deprive the victim[] of the property” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 105 [2011]; see People v Jennings, 69 NY2d at 118; People v Jacobs, 52 AD3d 432, 433 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 833 [2008]; see also People v Parker, 121 AD3d 1190, 1191 [2014]). [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
We say au revoir to our remaining relist from last week, Jacobs v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:39 am
The case is Shamir v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
