Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 921 - 940
of 3,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
On 29 November 2018 the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, David Gauke, issued a statement, “Controlling the costs of defamation cases”. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:49 am
In delivering the leading judgment Lord Mance stated that the appellant’s argument that the Scottish Ministers had no power under the 1989 Act to grant consent would be dismissed because it was not supported by the structure and language of the 1989 Act. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am
Image: Flickr.com R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42 In a nutshell The Government’s flagship scheme to deport foreign criminals first and hear their appeals later was ruled by the Supreme Court to be incompatible with the appellants’ right to respect for their private and family life (reversing the decision below). [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:04 pm
Ultimately, as Lord Hoffmann states in R-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, 131, Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights (provided it squarely confronts what it is doing). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 2:10 am
The panel will be Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
In a lengthy dissenting judgment, Lord Justice Sales disagreed with the application of the defence stating that the difference between his view and that of the majority was that he considered greater weight should be given to the rights of the trade mark owner and the protection of the interests of the relevant public. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm
Nor did Lord Malcom, who did not consider it “necessary to dwell” on the current state of the law concerning whether such a right existed. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:18 am
Lord Saville stated that Blair J had given the phrase inherent vice too wide a meaning, a fortuity which was unexceptional or foreseeable was still a fortuity. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:52 am
Lord Sumption writes that the UK’s traditional hostility to state interference with free speech stems not only from an attachment to individual liberty, but also from the awareness that such interference inhibits growth. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm
The principles set out in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] A.C. 22 were stated to apply to all jurisdictions and the principles of legal personality had to be respected. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation" - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat)… [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 8:59 am
” Kerr v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:05 am
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (o.t.a) v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:50 am
Q v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Good Lord we trust you as a friend. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall be granted only if the evidence be found sufficient, according to the laws of the place where the person sought shall be found, either to justify his committal for trial if the offense of which he is accused had been committed in that place or to prove that he is the identical person convicted by the courts of the requesting Party. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT The Supreme Court composed of President Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs unanimously dismissed the appeal. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 1:00 am
The panel will be Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
