Search for: "State v. M. C. M." Results 921 - 940 of 6,589
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:46 pm
Eu e o meu irmão mais novo víamos nossa mãe apenas a noite.Quando os professores entravam em greve, ela não entrava em greve. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 2:06 pm
All of those other states say that, yep, the landowner can be liable in such a setting, even in states that have their own analogue to Section 846.But not here in California. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
To the extent that [respondent] is an agency that services the entire State of New York, there may be instances where [m]embers of [respondent] work across county lines or in multiple counties on the same day. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
To the extent that [respondent] is an agency that services the entire State of New York, there may be instances where [m]embers of [respondent] work across county lines or in multiple counties on the same day. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
Relying on the earlier decision in Bromley LBC v C [2006] EWHC 1110 (Admin) [2006] ELR 358, the court held that the question as to whether there has been regular attendance is a question of fact and degree in each case. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:03 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Entry 50 of List II does not constitute an exception to the position of law laid down in M P V Sundararamier (supra). [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:34 am by Dwight Sullivan
WHETHER THE BALANCING TEST, AS ARTICULATED IN MRE 412(c)(3) AND UNITED STATES v. [read post]