Search for: "State v. Morgan" Results 921 - 940 of 2,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Melissa Milewski
Ethel New's law firm, for instance, also played a part in representing Irene Morgan in the 1946 NAACP-led suit Morgan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
United States (06-11429) and United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 8:13 am by Aurora Barnes
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:36 am by Broc Romanek
Just in time for the SEC’s 80th birthday (tomorrow is 80 years since the ’34 Act was signed into law), comes this news from Paul Weiss (we will be posting memos in our “SEC Enforcement” Practice Area): Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a significant decision in SEC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:37 am
In June 2010, the First Circuit of the State of Louisiana Court of Appeal reversed and remanded the case of Lena Hebert et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They state a claim for malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty–both of which have a three-year statute of limitations because defendants exclusively seek monetary damages (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009]; Matter of R.M Kliment & Frances Hals band, Architects, 3 NY3d 538, 541 [2004]). [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm by Jason Starling
By Jason Starling In what looks to be an ominous development for public-sector unions, the United States Supreme Court, on June 30, 2015, granted a petition for certiorari by the plaintiffs in Friedrichs v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:13 am
Even if it could be said that the return of an allegedly useless phone constituted an injury in fact, the subscribers did not suffer an injury because they declined to return their phones.The decision is Morgan v. [read post]