Search for: "State v. Murray" Results 921 - 940 of 1,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2011, 4:06 am by Max Kennerly
[Defendants' board-certified emergency physician expert] noted that when the first responders arrived on the scene, they found Murray to be in an asystolic state. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The roadmap expressly states it is not a guide to future compliance, but rather an information document setting out Ofcom’s present thinking. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:41 am by Yi W. Stewart
Rather than acknowledging a fiduciary’s consent as “lawful consent” under the federal statute (id.; see Ajemian v Yahoo! [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm by Alfred Brophy
 One of them, for instance, is United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
Ian Starr (Ashurst) lived up to his name by sending this link to an explanatory note on the UK's IPO website [nb after posting this item, the Kat checked his emails and found that Graeme Murray had also kindly sent him this]: "French Republic v DHL Express France [Now that's a surprise -- the referred case appears to have changed its name]Chronopost are the proprietors of French and Community trade marks "Webshipping" both of which were applied for in 2000.… [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was handed down in Sayed Zulfikar Abbas Bukhari v Syed Tauqeer Bukhari [2022] EWHC 173 (QB) on the 1 February 2022 by Murray J. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 5:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The additional proof required by the section need not be direct evidence linking the defendant to the crime as held in People v Murray. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  He dismissed the claim for state immunity brought by the former King of Spain. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 13 January 2023 Murray J heard CMCs in the cases of Al Sadeq v Dechert LLP and Quzmar v Dechert LLP Events 11 KBW’s Information Law Conference will be taking place on 24 April 2023. 11KBW’s market-leading specialists will provide insights and updates across the information law spectrum. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
On 17 April 2023, the Washington State House concurred to the State Senate’s amendments to Washington State House Bill 1155, the My Health My Data Act. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
He also analysed Murray (which grapples with the effect of publication of children’s facial features) and held that it did not mandate a context-free assessment of whether there was a REP. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
He also analysed Murray (which grapples with the effect of publication of children’s facial features) and held that it did not mandate a context-free assessment of whether there was a REP. [read post]