Search for: "State v. Music" Results 921 - 940 of 4,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2019, 9:20 pm by Chris Castle
Congress clearly states that anyone purchasing a bulk copy of the musical works database must pay the marginal cost to the MLC. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
And these authors created what they created in a specific cultural context; an Eames chair has a backstory and a story about its cultural significance over time, and the kinds of architecture, paintings, carpets, music, that are associated with these chairs. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
That is, if a suspect at any time prior to or during the questioning states that he wants to consult with an attorney, “the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 3:41 pm by Patricia Salkin
Town of Delaware v Leifer, 2019 NY Slip Op 08446 (N.Y. 11/21/19) (previously discussed here). [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 pm by Samuel Bray
This chapter starts with Maitland on equity's development, sketches the American history, addresses the formative idea of equity acting in personam, and covers the current state of the fusion of law and equity in the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 5:47 am by Chris Castle
  (But they tried–Line Item Veto Act ruled unconstitutional violation of presentment clause in Clinton v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:11 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Rusty Tucker In Texan Land & Cattle II, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Moreover, applying the Supreme Court’s 1995 opinion in Wyoming v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
 Permakat Eleonora Rosati wrote about Warner Music and Another v TuneIn Inc, an important High Court of England and Wales "test case" about infringement of copyright in sound recordings under section 20 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
On the patent side of the house, patent law is still in a state of (what I hope is) temporary insanity (at least I hope it’s temporary) about section 101 (patent subject matter) eligibility and the definition of “abstract idea” and other silly things. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am by Ben
This judgment seems fallacious in relying on Walden v Fiore as this judgment doesn’t cover situations where the defendant has minimum contacts with the United States and any of the states within itself. [read post]