Search for: "State v. Nixon"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 2:05 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:54 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
The execution of a person who can show that he is innocent comes perilously close to simple murder.Herrera v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 8:33 am
The Sixth Circuit case (Oklahoma v. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 8:33 pm
Sixth, Trump's pardon of Arpaio concerned his conviction, and "any other offenses under Chapter 21 of Title 18, United States Code that might arise, or be charged, in connection with Melendres v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:25 am
See People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:14 pm
Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431 (2001), and Nixon v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 11:04 am
This sets at odds two fundamental and compelling national interests: on the one hand, the Constitution's requirement that the President must not be unduly encumbered in fulfilling his weighty responsibilities, see Nixon v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Since then, Judge Ginsburg has remained a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 8:16 pm
[www.marioncountyclerk.org] Case Number: 42-1981-CF-000170-AXXX-XXFile Date: 02/04/1981Judge: CARVEN D ANGEL DEFENDANT :LIGHTBOURNE IAN (DOB: 1959) Attorney: PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE Charges Date Citation Count Charge Level Degree Disposition 04/25/1981 1 MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE F CAPITAL ADJUDICATED GUILTY Dockets Date Event Count Party Amount 09/12/2007 CORR/MEMO TO CLERKS OFFICE LIGHTBOURNE IAN $0.00 FROM CCRC FILING MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR … [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
" Congress also has the power to investigate the workings of the Executive branch simply to determine whether legislative amendments are necessary in order prevent or deter undesirable government practices, and perhaps even for the basic function of facilitating "the American people's ability to reconstruct and come to terms with their history," Nixon v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
Indeed, many have argued that the aspiration of Brown v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:15 am
If it was wrong when Nixon did it, it’s still wrong. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:01 pm
"Well, now that's a little more direct, an administration official stating that the Fairness Doctrine was used to harass political opponents. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:37 am
Supreme Court agreed to decide this past Monday in the case of Green v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am
Morales-Santana does not quite rise to the level of United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:57 am
Bic Corp., 851 F.2d 673, 678 (3d Cir. 1988) (citing Nixon v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am
United States (1926), but they never acknowledge that the Brandeis dissent was rooted in a commitment to participatory democracy that Reynolds did not share. [read post]
