Search for: "State v. Parks"
Results 921 - 940
of 10,184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Collins v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:17 am
The court distinguished the case from Audette v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:43 am
Curtis v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
United States, 247 F. 3d 1032 (2001) (en banc); John v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Davaut v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Davaut v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 11:27 am
Sturgeon immediately got on his satellite phone and contacted his attorney, claiming that NPS regulations were inapplicable because he was hovering over a state-owned navigable river.That's right. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Click here to read the Court's opinion in Fitzherbert v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:37 pm
Invoking Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:50 am
Pierce v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 1:27 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:41 pm
The Castle v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
The Courts that have upheld warrantless GPS searches have cited the 1983 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:41 am
To the south lies the Chaparral Wildlife Refuge, owned by the State and managed by Texas Parks & Wildlife. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Kedrowski v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
Educational Services, 90 NY2d 110, the Court held that Deer Park violated Moraitis' rights "as established by the statutory scheme instituted in this State which, [Moraitis] correctly notes, is to be read broadly in favor of the teacher. [read post]
