Search for: "State v. Perry"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
John’s University, USA (invited) Perry Dane, Rutgers University School of Law, USA, “Endorsement, Legal Reason, and the Misguided Quest for Reasonableness” Javier Martinez-Torron, Complutense University School of Law, Spain, “Institutional Religious Symbols, State Neutrality and Protection of Minorities” Session 2 – Hate speech, hate crimes and religious minorities H. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
In the case, United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
Perry, in which the Court dismissed the lawsuit over Proposition 8 in California.) [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:21 am
The classic example was Naim v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
Perry; the firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
The Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Broad coverage of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:14 am
It would also undermine the argument that Perry v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
Perry, the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:15 pm
Perry last Wednesday, the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Perry & US v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
In Perry, the state of California (represented by a guy named Hollingsworth) asked for it to be reversed, which should have kept it alive. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 1:14 am
It would also undermine the argument that Perry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
Perry. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Perry, United States Supreme Court (6/26/13)United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:55 am
United States [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
