Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 921 - 940
of 13,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2020, 3:31 am
The notice stated that Lard-PT either could purchase Kolmar’s 51% interest for approximately $10.4 million or it could sell its 49% interest to Kolmar for $10 million. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
"Judge Price concurred, along with Judge Johnson and Judge Holcomb. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:17 am
Case citation: Patel v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:21 pm
In Stephans v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:26 am
The case of Marine Travelift, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 8:42 am
In Brooks v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:11 pm
He will remind Israel he supports Palestine becoming a state. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:49 pm
Lower Drug Prices for Consumers (LDPFC) v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:14 am
The plaintiffs in Whaley et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 2:59 pm
” National Automobile Dealers Assoc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court—in Hughes v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:51 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
However, the Ninth Circuit appeals court decided in a 2018 case also involving U.S. commodities laws in foreign markets (Stoyas v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:02 am
In Birch v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:02 am
In Birch v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
This first post will discuss the overall biopharmaceutical market and the FTC’s stated theory of harm. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:00 pm
Langham v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm
The post Cruz v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:43 am
More recently, in Hassen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Citing Thompson v. 1800-Contacts, the court finds antitrust standing among consumers who possibly paid higher prices due to the restrictions on keyword ads: Plaintiff has alleged that Defendants agreed to manipulate paid search results so that when a cons [read post]