Search for: "State v. Primes" Results 921 - 940 of 2,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2017, 5:19 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
As expected from the Court, there were times when the Chief Justice directly found herself in conflict with the government over Charter rights, notably in the unanimous 2010 decision in Canada (Prime Minister) v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:04 am by Orin Kerr
Lask, effectively ending strip-search class actions in three states, Mr. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:15 pm
Four cases pending in front of the North Carolina Supreme Court are prime examples. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm by MOTP
HOUSE BELOW GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C.; WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; BEST INSURORS, INCORPORATED; MID STATE CAPITAL, L.L.C.; MID STATE TRUST II; MID STATE TRUST III; MID STATE TRUST IV; MID STATE TRUST V; MID STATE TRUST VI; MID STATE TRUST VII; MID STATE TRUST VIII; MID STATE TRUST IX; MID STATE TRUST X; MID STATE TRUST XI; WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY; MID-STATE… [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:51 am
Until the Supreme Court filed its June 17, 2022 opinion in Borst Brothers Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
As case after case comes before the court, challenging his core values, John makes a fateful decision: He breaks with his colleagues in fundamental ways, becoming the nation’s prime defender of the rights of Black people, immigrant laborers, and people in distant lands occupied by the United States.Harlan’s dissents, particularly in Plessy v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:51 am
Until the Supreme Court filed its June 17, 2022 opinion in Borst Brothers Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:33 am
In a long-awaited decision, the Federal Circuit ruled en banc to uphold the the de novo standard for appellate review of claim construction issues, which was previously established in another en banc decision, Cybor Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 9:28 am by Sandy Levinson
 (Ask yourself if the United States could reinstitute slavery by adding a new amendment proposed and ratified in accordance with the procedures set out in Article V.)Still, the obvious question is whether such determinations are better made by ostensible "experts," whether in law, philosophy, or whatever, or by "we the people" engaging in what Publics might have called 'reflection and choice" about an issue of fundamental importance, which… [read post]