Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 921 - 940
of 20,850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2007, 5:27 am
Today it granted review of two issues in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:13 am
State of Oklahoma. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:50 am
And the very well-reasoned dissent also makes it clear that the state of the law did not require this sweeping limitation on first sale. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:50 pm
In Uniloy Milacron USA, Inc v Department of Treasury, No 300749, the Court of Appeals considered whether the Single Business Tax Act apportioned certain sales to Michigan. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 5:30 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
Autodesk UMG Can't Enforce "Not for Sale" Restrictions on Promo CDs -- UMG v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:21 am
Alaska v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:31 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:05 am
The packaging of the perfume bottles in question was clearly labelled "not for sale". [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:57 pm
Nix v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:32 am
In the recent case of JM Vidal, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in awarding civil remedies under the Lanham Act for infringement of U.S. trademarks through purely foreign sales that neither reached the United States nor confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in awarding civil remedies under the Lanham Act for infringement of U.S. trademarks through purely foreign sales that neither reached the United States nor confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
(Citibank was not required to produce a written agreement to recover on account-stated theory) -- CONTRA -- Tully v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:10 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
But some states like New York will look at them under the same test - meaning counsel must tailor them narrowly to protect an employer's business interest. -- Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Opinion Date: 10/1/09 Cite: Cenveo Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:44 am
Total Rebuild, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
The case is Thomas Estler, et al., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
See Ammerman v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:00 am
Rev. 116 (2021): The United States Supreme Court saved the states’ sales tax base in the landmark case of South Dakota v. [read post]
