Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 921 - 940
of 4,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2016, 8:55 am
In the case, Edwards v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:55 am
In the case, Edwards v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:27 pm
Stu Dedopoulos, who does a wonderful job of keeping me informed, has brought to my attention the decision of the supreme court of his home state of New Hampshire, issued today, in State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:55 am
Ana-Lab would not compare the pre-discharge sample analysis with the composite sample of the actual discharge. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
See State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:06 am
Ty, Inc., 362 F.3d 986, 992 (7th Cir. 2004); United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Maryland v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 4:44 am
DC Comics (2003) 30 Cal.4th 881 and Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:44 am
In a 4-3 opinion, the Arizona high court ruled in State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:49 pm
At trial, an analyst who completed the final, but not initial, steps in analyzing the DNA sample from the apartment testified that the sample matched a reference sample of Chavis’ DNA. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:05 pm
In general, larger sample sizes are better than smaller sample sizes. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 pm
Oregon and Johnson v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:13 pm
Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 12:20 pm
Advance Dx, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:00 am
"In response to a demand for certain records involving the activities and conduct of correction officers, the Appellate Division said that its in camera review of a sampling of the requested documents in unredacted form "reveals that the factual description of events contained in the reports was 'neutral and did not contain any invidious implications capable facially of harassment or degradation of the officer in a courtroom'. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:00 am
"In response to a demand for certain records involving the activities and conduct of correction officers, the Appellate Division said that its in camera review of a sampling of the requested documents in unredacted form "reveals that the factual description of events contained in the reports was 'neutral and did not contain any invidious implications capable facially of harassment or degradation of the officer in a courtroom'. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:48 am
Take, for example, this week’s Seventh Circuit decision in Espenscheid v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:06 am
This case, State of Minnesota v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:42 am
The Wal-Mart v. [read post]
