Search for: "State v. Shorter" Results 921 - 940 of 1,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am by Susan Brenner
They described one of the subjects as Hispanic and as being shorter than his companion. . . . [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:46 am by Giles Peaker
With ‘ASB reasons’ the regulations confirm in order to use the shorter timescale, the landlords for both Demoted or Introductory Tenancies would need to set out reasons of antisocial behaviour which meet the same standard as per shorter notices for Secure tenancy possession notices, that is to say, ground 2, 2A, or section 84A(3) to (7). [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:01 am by Farah Pandith, Jacob Ware
In al-Hol, for instance, Islamic State women killed over 70 people last year. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:59 am by Susanne Gössl
Norms within the framework of Savigny’s conflict laws referred exclusively to state law, assuming a state based on Western understanding. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm by Ryan Calo
The prospect of excessive surveillance through technology was recently front and center in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:46 am
Posted by Sherry Colb  In my FindLaw column this week, I discuss the case of Graham v. [read post]
She is expected to work long hours during tax season, but will face shorter work weeks come summertime. [read post]
She is expected to work long hours during tax season, but will face shorter work weeks come summertime. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:47 pm by Ilya Somin
In my view, a far better answer to the government’s argument is that the mandate isn’t “proper” even if it is “necessary” and that it runs afoul of the five part test recently outlined by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]