Search for: "State v. Starks"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Morrison v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
That is, the court held that where the legislature granted wide discretion to the agency, such as to “have regard to” stated factors in taking a decision, a court should go no further than ensuring that the agency, in fact, has taken account of the stated factors and “struck a reasonable equilibrium between them”. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Stark and Ezekiel J. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:53 am
Shapiro v Ettenson, 2019 NY Slip Op 33793(U) [Sup Ct NY County Dec. 23, 2019]. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 7:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
(b) The occasional rendering of services in this state by a physician if the physician: (I) Is licensed and lawfully practicing medicine in another state or territory of the United States without restrictions or conditions on the physician's license; (II) Does not have any established or regularly used medical staff membership or clinical privileges in this state; (III) Is not party to any contract, agreement, or understanding to provide services in this… [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
Texas Sec. of State, 2020 WL 5367216 (W.D. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:40 pm
Washington, a dispute between states over Washington’s denial of access to its ports to ship coal from Montana and Wyoming overseas; Hughes v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:51 am
Although June Medical v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
He [Jan Luba QC] submits that the stark choice the judge perceived to be applicable was between the land being “taken” by the occupiers and the owner being “deprived” of it and the immediate eviction of the occupiers: see paragraphs [83] and [85] of her judgment. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
Hart v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm
The INA’s antidiscrimination mandate makes such stark distinctions the province of Congress, not the executive. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
The law would meet the other requirements of South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Students v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:03 am
The case is entitled Kruse v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:35 pm
., v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
Background The plaintiffs in Pippen v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:46 am
The recent New Jersey Appellate Division case of Kotsogiannis v. [read post]
