Search for: "State v. Superior Court" Results 921 - 940 of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2008, 9:43 pm
In dictum, the Court of Appeal cited a recent SCOTUS case, Taylor v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:20 pm by zshapiro
While the appeal was pending before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court the United States Supreme Court ruled in Gray v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The state court case was removed to federal court on diversity grounds and the Second Circuit had to determine whether Trump's allegedly defamatory comments were made within the scope of his employment as President of the United States.The case is Carroll v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
Superior Court of California, Orange County 13-956 Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred when it deepened an acknowledged circuit split and held—contrary to this Court’s decisions in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
This imports the sequencing familiar in the Chevron context from United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:50 am by gstasiewicz
Rodearmel challenging Hillary Clinton's constitutional eligibility to serve as Secretary of State (Rodearmel v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 6:34 pm by Matt Cooper
Raffensperger, a Fulton County Superior Court Judge dismissed a petition for election contest alleging that Georgia officials violated state and federal law in how they administered the November election. [read post]
A California Superior Court judge has invalidated state legislation that required boards of publicly held corporations headquartered in California to include a minimum number of directors from underrepresented communities. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 9:58 am
  Nonetheless, I had to gasp for a second when I read the release associated with a Mercer County Superior Court judge's decision in State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:50 pm
Judgment Released: March 16, 2012   Link to Judgment Rule 57.05(1), stating that a plaintiff in a Superior Court action who recovers less than the monetary jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court might not recover costs, applies even where the monetary jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court increases during the pendency of the action. [read post]