Search for: "Stephens v. United States"
Results 921 - 940
of 3,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
All these sources, in Judge Fletcher's excellent formulation, were laws for the United States, if not of the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
United States, which “centers on the federal government taking water developed and stored solely for irrigation uses authorized through the 1905 Klamath Project,” and “to protect the private property rights of farmers and ranchers in the Western states. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:09 pm
As Justice Stephen Breyer wrote in his dissent in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:46 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 222, 227-30, 100 S.Ct. 1108, 63 L.Ed.2d 348 (1980), first recognized the “classical” theory of insider trading. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 4:51 am
The City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge (“City–Parish”) filed suit in the district court on March 20, 2012 seeking injunctive relief against the defendant, Stephen C. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 4:51 am
The City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge (“City–Parish”) filed suit in the district court on March 20, 2012 seeking injunctive relief against the defendant, Stephen C. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:41 am
His appeal was denied by the 11th Circuit, but Bostock’s attorneys argued the circuit’s precedents conflicted with two United States Supreme Court decisions: Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
How do the bishops continue to wield sufficient political power to pack the United States Supreme Court while under the microscope for destroying so many children and families? [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
No one thought these states were no longer in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:27 am
Since at least 1924, when the Supreme Court endorsed it in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:20 pm
.), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania addressed whether a plaintiff who sought to use expert testimony to prove elements of a claim under the res ipsa loquitur doctrine was barred due to the Certificate of Merit election imposed by Rule 1042.3(a)(1). [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm
In particular, we have to distinguish specific questions of original meaning from more general—and, here, more relevant—questions of original law: that is, the law of the United States as it stood at the Founding, and as it's been lawfully changed to the present day. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
To mitigate the effect of that violation, Canada must present a request to the United States for Mr. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
See, e.g., Wiggins v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 1:50 pm
§ 1503, which was limited with a pending-proceeding requirement in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:11 am
DESCARGA Y LEE la decisión del caso United States of America v. [read post]
