Search for: "Stephens v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 3,644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which permits the president to bar entry of foreign nationals that would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Corporations carry on business internationally and have affiliated offices throughout southern Ontario and the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by Michelle Ghetti
This would be devastating to gun-related commerce throughout the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:58 pm by Amy Howe
And that’s not an embarrassment to the United States or the executive branch. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm by Mark Walsh
As CNN Supreme Court reporter Ariane de Vogue noted over the weekend, Luis Cortes, a 31-year-old graduate of the University of Idaho College of Law who came with his parents to the United States from Mexico when he was one year old, is joining Theodore Olson at the table. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:21 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am by skelly
All placements of insurance in the United States are generally subject to state premium taxation, but the responsible taxpayer depends on the type of insurance policy issued. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Mesa, which “asks whether there is a remedy for a Mexican citizen killed when a Border Patrol agent in the United States opens fire on someone in Mexico,” and Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:03 am by Lisa Heinzerling
Arguing on behalf of the United States as an amicus, Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart urged the court to adopt the EPA’s interpretation, but conspicuously did not ask the court to defer to it. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
At Vox (via How Appealing), Ian Millhiser argues that United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and  the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]