Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
The Supreme Court has recognized a right to gather news. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 6:02 am
" The Magistrate Judge had since retired, and didn't challenge the discipline, so the court concluded that it should "accept the [retired judge's] stipulations and take no additional action. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
Even so, it would not follow that in cases such as this, in which the judicial screening had failed to prevent the search (although it certainly succeeded in creating a written record), the fruits of the search should be suppressed at the defendant's trial. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:38 am
He chose to not engage in commerce when the government told him to, and the Supreme Court said it was within Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce under the principle of market aggregation to fine Mr. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:21 pm
In November, Caddo Parish commissioners voted 11-1 to take it down, after litigation charging racial bias in several death penalty cases argued under the flag got the attention of the Louisiana Supreme Court and the national media. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:24 am
True, governing Supreme Court precedent—specifically Farmer v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
NH Public Defender Executive Director Christopher Keating told commissioners that by next June 30 the state will have spent $1.3 million to defend Addison and appeal his verdict to the state Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
A town of about 40,000 people, it is the county seat for Luzerne, in the northeast part of the state. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
"EU rules require large companies and listed companies to publish regular reports on the social and environmental risks they face, and on how their activities impact people and the environment. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
They are members of The Joint Committee on Human Rights, and they have just published this: "Monitoring the Government's Response to Human Rights Judgments: Annual Report 2008". [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 7:33 am
In reaching that conclusion, we follow the Supreme Court in affording great weight to the Government's "evaluation of the facts" because the Act "implicates sensitive and weighty interests of national security and foreign affairs. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
They are annexed as the Communication's Action Points (my label). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
They are annexed as the Communication's Action Points (my label). [read post]
8 May 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court Justice William Douglas was FDR’s preferred candidate, and Alben Barkley and James Byrnes were other strong candidates. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
Because the Act does not define “private,” our Supreme Court has adopted the dictionary definition: “belonging to one’s self . . . secret . . . intended only for the persons involved (a conversation) . . . holding a confidential relationship to something . . . [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:31 am
Palmer, 285 Ga. 75, 673 S.E.2d 237 (Georgia Supreme Court 2009); Whitten v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
” Some, like violent content and hate speech, have been specifically identified as First Amendment-protected expression in relatively recent Supreme Court rulings – including a case holding that California could not restrict minors from seeing violent content in video games. [read post]
30 May 2009, 6:45 am
This particular defendant, Inciarrano, went into someone's business and shot and killed them and the entire event was being recorded by the victim without the defendant’s knowledge. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:11 am
Let's have one. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:28 pm
But that's a question for another day. [read post]
