Search for: "T " Results 921 - 940 of 881,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2017, 3:15 pm by Rick Garnett
My Mirror of Justice colleague and Villanova prawf Patrick Brennan posted over there that Judge John T. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Such a negative limitation can therefore be deduced from the application as filed (see T 278/88). [3.2] However, negative limitations may be used only if adding positive features to the claim either would not define more clearly and concisely the subject-matter still protectable (see T 4/80) or would unduly limit the scope of the claim (see T 1050/93). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is established Board of Appeal case law that further grounds which would lead to a refusal of a European patent application in the examination proceedings cannot be successfully presented in opposition proceedings (see for example G 1/91; J 22/86 [18]; T 99/85 [4]; T 127/85; T 301/87 [3.3-4]; T 550/88 [4]; T 428/95 [4.2]). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:09 am by Joseph Erlichman, P.C.
A 30-year-old female passenger died early Friday morning in a terrible T-bone car accident that occured in Phoenix, Arizona. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
”A similar position is also held by other Boards of appeal, as can be seen from the cited decisions T 382/96 and T 446/00, but also decisions T 1126/97 [3.1.1 et seq.] and T 47/03 [1.1, 1.4 et seq.] as well as T 745/03 [2.2] and T 221/0 [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
These effects are more like those in T 158/88 and T 603/89 than in T 26/86. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm by Jon Brodkin
T-Mobile US CEO John Legere eliminated contracts, but not cramming. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This was acknowledged in decision T 465/92. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In accordance with the established case law of the boards of appeal (see Case Law, 6th edition, chapter VI.C.2.) the board consequently states that in the case of a request for OPs by a party the OD has no power to issue a decision adversely affecting such party without first appointing OPs (see T 686/92 [3]; T 795/91 [3]).In the present case, however, in view of the positive conclusion in favour of the opponent the OD had reached regarding the question of novelty (see its… [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am by Nico Cordes
Die jüngsten der Kammer bekannten Entscheidungen stammen aus den Jahren 2011 und 2012: T 239/08, T 2135/08, T 1600/09, T 207/10, T 648/10 und T 747/10. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:28 pm by Kedar
Tags: Just for Fun, T-shirt Time Related posts No related posts detected. [read post]