Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Scott Michelman, of California (Jay Rorty, of California, & John Reinstein with him) for the defendant. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
I rate this a likely grant, and the odds are good the court is simply taking the extra week to check for vehicle problems and deciding which of the two to take (although it could take both and consolidate). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:18 am
Later in the evening at their home, [Rocio] decided to take a nap because she had duty the next day. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
On the heels of Patel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am
And Petitioners have a pending motion to intervene in another case challenging the Rule in the Northern District of California, which means that when all is said and done they will have been subjected to all three approaches that the courts of appeals take to adequacy of representation. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
(Maybe sex offenses, but maybe also drug offenses; many parents might not want their children to fall in with the wrong crowd online and be exposed to bad influences.) [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
This objection is mostly misguided.In the 2005 case of Gonzales v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Kobach v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:01 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Chavez, No. 054679, 055401 Convictions for narcotics conspiracy and possession of a silencer-equipped firearm in furtherance of that conspiracy and imposing consecutive sentences for co-defendant's two offenses are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient to support their conviction; and 2) their sentences were unreasonable U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, December 08, 2008 Carrion v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm
Mann and other members of their group: “What will it take for the administration to take its students seriously? [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:07 am
The Supreme Court ruled in Schmerber v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:17 am
That reaction followed a pattern over recent years in which mass shootings and other violent attacks—like those in El Paso, Texas; Gilroy, California; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania—have spurred demands for an increased federal focus on domestic terrorism. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
Rauen v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:05 am
State of California, et al., U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:48 am
(California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
But a Californian court has held he was engaged in protected First Amendment speech when he seized the microphone at a bingo game and began calling offensive versions of the numbers. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Failure to Warn: CALIFORNIA APPEALS COURT BACKS DISMISSAL OF SURGICAL TOOL INJURY SUIT, Courtenay v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am
Since that decision, the First Amendment right to free expression permits citizens to seek registration of racially offensive trademarks. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
As Justice Harlan wrote in Cohen v. [read post]
