Search for: "The People v. Clark" Results 921 - 940 of 1,252
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Steve Doughty of the “Mail Online” reports the story under the headline “Prove you’ve suffered REAL damage, Clarke tells rich and powerful in shake-up of libel laws” . [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am by Peter Tillers
If time allows, the Program Committee will review papers by other people for possible presentation at the workshop. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Discusses Clift v Clarke, about a Norwich Pharmacal disclosure application in libel action following critical comments made on a newspaper’s website. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
The seminar, ""Future Plans: next steps for trade marks in Europe", was launched only mid-day yesterday, but now has more than 60 people registered to attend on the afternoon of Tuesday 5 April at the London office of law firm Simmons & Simmons. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:17 am
This conclusion is consistent with the view of the New York Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:14 am by Northwestern University Law Review
Clark and Simple Pleading: Against a “Formalism of Generality” [citation] Peter Julian Cooper Technologies Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
In our firm's continuing effort to inform the public of important legal issues, from time to time we will reproduce in our blog letters, articles, and papers written by other people. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
So written terms that people intended as a complete and final expression of their bargain on the subject cannot be supplemented or contradicted by evidence of prior agreements or any oral contemporaneous agreements. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
He added that the UK had the stark options of either accepting the ECHR, or not accepting it and leaving the Council of Europe, but expressed relief at Kenneth Clarke’s pledge that the UK would not withdraw from the ECHR. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am by INFORRM
Reports that, in the case of Clift v Clarke, the applicant has failed in a bid to obtain an order forcing Mail Online to disclose the identities of two people who made comments about her on the newspaper website. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
Clarke made clear that the mechanics to achieve compliance were “still to be settled”. [read post]