Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 921 - 940
of 8,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2015, 10:34 am
At least if that Nevada conviction took place in 2009 (as petitioner's did); as of 2013, even in Nevada, such a conviction wouldn't subject you to removal (since the maximum penalty is now 364 days).But since it was in Nevada, and since it was 2009, petitioner gets deported even though he's been in the United States for nearly two decades, and even if he can show, e.g., exceptional hardship to U.S. citizens as a result of his removal. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:53 am
United States (09-479; 09-7073) Thursday, July 16: Petitioner’s reply brief in Michigan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:11 pm
She then returned to the United States using her green card. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:25 pm
United States (2019) The Supreme Court handed down its decision in Gamble vs. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
" Noting that "Pursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer", the Appellate Division opined that Petitioner's job duties included on-the-job training in law enforcement techniques and Petitioner acknowledged that his duties as part of the unit to which he was assigned included bicycle training. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
" Noting that "Pursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer", the Appellate Division opined that Petitioner's job duties included on-the-job training in law enforcement techniques and Petitioner acknowledged that his duties as part of the unit to which he was assigned included bicycle training. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 5:26 am
In this case, the Petitioner-company has been doing business for 23 years in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:37 am
Our law firm often works with foreign national whose work is in the national interest of the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:37 am
Our law firm often works with foreign national whose work is in the national interest of the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:05 am
Thus, the ultimate relief sought in the present case does not guarantee release into the United States and, thus, could not be considered habeas relief. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
She has resided in the United States for the last nine years. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:59 pm
Brief for the American Legion in Support of Petitioner: Brief for the Congressional Medal of Honor Foundation in Support of Petitioner: Brief for the Legion of Valor of the United States and the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner: Brief for Professors Eugene Volokh and James Weinstein in Support of Petitioner Brief for Texas, Alabama, Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, and… [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:46 pm
United States, No. 11-1395, which seeks review of CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:25 am
United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 5:35 pm
United States 17-1237 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:10 pm
United States—including the petitioner’s request for initial en banc hearing. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:20 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:20 pm
United States 17-270 Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:11 pm
United States 13-1367 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioners in this case. [read post]
