Search for: "Tom Goldstein"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2007, 6:30 am
Tom Goldstein suggests that these alternatives, including drawing district lines with race in mind, are "per se constitutional," see here, while Michael Rosman seems to suggest that some of these alternatives could be subject to strict scrutiny under the Court's precedents, see here. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
Tom is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, so I'm not surprised that he's wrong. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:10 pm
Jimenez then took on Tom Goldstein of Akin Gump and the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic to represent him on the merits. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Finally, in a high profile case that did not make our watch list — Goldstein v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
[Disclosure: Tejinder Singh of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in this case.] [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
As Leslie Goldstein explains in “The Birth and Rebirth of Civil Rights in America,” (50 Tulsa L. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
(forthcoming) Cases involving lawyers from Goldstein & Russell (listed witho [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 1:03 am
Supreme Court is headed for dismissal just a week before justices were to have heard arguments, Washington lawyer Tom Goldstein said Wednesday. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:19 am
Thanks to Tom Mitsch for compiling the relists. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
We feature petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
Here's Tom Goldstein on the ruling:It seems a shame to erect obstacles to access when organizations like ours share the values and further the goals of journalism. [read post]
