Search for: "Trademark Cases"
Results 921 - 940
of 23,981
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2023, 3:17 am
This comprehensive article reviews the special remedies for counterfeiting under the Lanham Act and the current state of the case law relating to the availability of these remedies.Public Policy and Morality in Trademark Examination in the European Union, Yann Basire and Stefan Martin. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:21 pm
” Intellectual property can include registered IP, such as trademarks and patents, and unregistered IP, such as trade secrets. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am
The case did not arrive at the court on a blank slate. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:33 am
This was the case prior to Applicant’s proven date of first use of its mark. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 5:19 am
It is understandable why (most) trademarks owners do not like the five-year dependency period of an international registration since in case of “central attack” or refusal of the basic application, they face cancellation of their international registration. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Filing a Section 337 case with the International Trade Commission in Washington, D.C. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 9:15 am
The case has provoked widespread discussion among IP lawyers across the world regarding similar cases in other jurisdictions. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 9:15 am
The case has provoked widespread discussion among IP lawyers across the world regarding similar cases in other jurisdictions. [read post]
European Union Trademarks and Austria: Famous mark PUMA beats “PUMA Multipower” for dissimilar goods
1 Jul 2023, 2:36 am
Background of the case In a recent opposition case, the Higher Regional Court Vienna (“HRC), had the rare opportunity to shed some light on the scope of protection of the well-known trademark “PUMA” as against a similar mark applied for entirely dissimilar goods (decision of 22.03.2023, case 33 R 80/22k). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:42 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:22 am
Also, remember to check for hidden trademarks inside the image that the photographer missed. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:22 am
Also, remember to check for hidden trademarks inside the image that the photographer missed. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 7:29 am
Many were surprised that Lidl was successful on this ground, as it was not a traditional case of selling goods as those of another. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Claim that life insurer knew death rate had risen a lot when its CFO called it “normal” and only “slightly negative” met “falsity” test under Securities Exchange Act of 1934. https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/211147p.pdf The Contingency lands on FeedSpot’s 30 Best Antitrust Law Blogs and Websites. https://blog.feedspot.com/antitrust_law_blogs/ Limitations defense may work despite no proof of exact date when claims accrued.… [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
The appeals court found that the TTAB made several significant errors and thus vacated and remanded the case. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
The appeals court found that the TTAB made several significant errors and thus vacated and remanded the case. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 4:15 am
Below, we (1) explain what upcycling is, (2) discuss potential legal issues arising from upcycled products, (3) summarize recent cases involving upcycled products, and (4) propose successful brand protection measures. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 4:15 am
Below, we (1) explain what upcycling is, (2) discuss potential legal issues arising from upcycled products, (3) summarize recent cases involving upcycled products, and (4) propose successful brand protection measures. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:34 am
If we put this case to the side, the Rogers test has applied only to cases involving “non-trademark uses”—or otherwise said, cases in which “the defendant has used the mark” at issue in a “non-source-identifying way. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:03 am
(So, one thing that distinguishes this case from several other plaintiff-sues-original-author cases like Fogerty v. [read post]
