Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES"
Results 921 - 940
of 3,026
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2010, 9:18 am
The court went on to rule that a Rule 23(b)(2) was also inappropriate, as there could not be a uniform damages recovery. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
This led the Supreme Court to reverse the judgment, citing the one-way intervention rule. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
The four-Justice dissent in this case argued that the direct appeal was outside the Texas Supreme Court’s jurisdiction because the trial court’s order did not purport to rule on the constitutionality of a state statute. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:02 am
The district court entered summary judgment in favor of Kantar on both claims and Kantar sought fees from TRA. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
Signature Matching Lacks Uniform Standards Lawsuits challenging the verification process itself typically allege that the state lacks uniform standards or criteria for matching ballot signatures to signatures on record. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:35 am
In a recent decision having broad implications for employers, the First Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal in Seymore v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 1:31 pm
They went one step further and showed the court that if you looked beyond Massachusetts, there was a “uniformity of jurisprudence against holding hospitals strictly liable for warranty breaches. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:50 am
Burwell, a district court in Oklahoma ruled against the IRS, and a decision in a fourth case — Indiana v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:57 am
Moreover, the district court was further advised, in the event Rule 23(b)(2) certification was not appropriate, to consider certification under Rule 23(b)(3) (which has been deemed appropriate in the Ninth Circuit). [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
Rules of Court, rule 8.500(b)(1) [the Court may order review “[w]hen necessary to secure uniformity of decision or to settle an important question of law”].) [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 11:29 am
A trial court was correct to find a breach of fiduciary duty in a real estate partnership, the First District Court of Appeal ruled March 27. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:36 am
Drivers for a delivery service company who claimed they were improperly treated as independent contractors rather than employees could proceed with their state law claim for unlawful deduction of expenses from their pay, as their claim was not preempted by the FAAAA, a federal district court in Massachusetts ruled. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:14 am
Bigstock From Paul Alan Levy (Public Citizen), who represented the customer and her husband; here’s an excerpt (some paragraph breaks added): A state District Court in Dallas (Judge Jim Jordan of the 160th District) has struck down a lawsuit over a non-disparagement clause in a form consumer agreement, holding that it could not be enforced against a consumer who expressed dissatisfaction about the service provided by a local business. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 2:00 pm
” The order noted that it was “final and appealable pursuant to [Illinois Supreme Court Rule 304(a)]. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:44 am
While the court held that the complaint stated such a claim, however, it also found that it relied upon what the plaintiff was told in orientation, not a uniform policy, and that the case could therefore not be handled as a collective action. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:05 am
As discussed below, the Court held that uniform testimony from dozens of individual employees can establish liability without the need for statistical evidence. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:47 pm
The Ninth Circuit vacated the lower court’s decision and found the district court abused its discretion by relying almost exclusively on the existence of a uniform policy which classified the loan specialists as exempt. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 6:21 am
By dismissing this case, the opinion of the Second District Court of Appeals stands. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
The Court of Appeal then considered the decertification ruling as it related to the breach of warranty claim. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:41 am
An African-American police officer with Pseudofolliculitis Barbae (PFB), a medical condition aggravated by shaving that predominantly affects black men, could not show his employer’s directive that officers be clean shaven had a disparate impact based on race, a federal district court in Pennsylvania ruled, granting summary judgment against his Title VII claim. [read post]
