Search for: "US v. CLARK " Results 921 - 940 of 3,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm by Barry Eagar
Citing MID Sydney Pty Ltd v Australian Tourism Co Ltd (1998) 90 FCR 236, traders conducting their business from the Chifley Tower building in Sydney would not have infringed the plaintiff's trade mark ("Chifley Tower") if they used that name in good faith as the name of their place of business. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:32 am by Peter Mahler
Bryan and Jeff (but not Joe, who objected to his brothers’ use of a Clark-owned entity for funding) made voluntary capital  contributions to repay in full the Clark loans. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:14 am
Franklin and Clarke, 499 F.3d 578 (6th Cir. 8/28/07), rehrg and rehrg en banc denied 1/25/08 (Forester, D.J. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
As Kitchin LJ said in Maier v ASOS [2015]EWCA Civ 220, the key question is "whether the use that Asos has made of the sign ASOS has been in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:52 am by Lindsay Griffiths
  Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rules Announced from Ogden Murphy Wallace: OMW's Elana Zana talks about the recent announcement of the Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rules. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Clark Equipment Co., 122 S.W.3d 530, 533-37 (Ky. 2003); Tabieros v. [read post]