Search for: "United State of America v. Doe"
Results 921 - 940
of 4,124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
The defendants moved to dismiss Relator #2’s new qui tam on the grounds that a “common plaintiff, the United States of America, has filed two proper lawsuits . . . against the Defendants alleging identical claims” and thus should be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a).In dismissing Relator #2’s new qui tam, the Court found that the two dismissal rule applied because “[i]t is undisputed that a common plaintiff, the United States… [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 2:11 am
As does Mark Levin. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:41 am
His case, to which a state court applied the “automobile exception,” does not even involve a car, but rather a motorcycle. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Can you describe the differences between statutory law systems in the United States and the statutory codes of European states? [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:13 pm
United States (Wednesday, Dec. 5) This post was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
(in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America (in support of petitioners) [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:43 am
A United States 5th Circuit of Appeals case dealt with the "Anti-Technically" Statute recently. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 10:55 am
In Dreiling v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
In an email Kidde sent inNovember 2010, [he] stated he could no longer work with Bergstein because Bank of America had put him on ChexSystems, which prevented him from opening a bank account anywhere in the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
For instance, in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
See Doe v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 11:33 am
In United States of America v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
And in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm
In a decision that spoke somewhat tentatively about an “evolving understanding of the meaning of equality,” the Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:07 pm
§ 2201 et seq., does not permit a party to assert a defense to suit anticipatorily where the underlying substantive statute does not itself authorize such declaratory relief.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Cir.)Petition for certiorariMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of National Association of ManufacturersMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of Halliburton Co.Motion for leave to file and amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United… [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
Thomas trial, believed to be the first RIAA case to go to trial in the United States.) **10/4/07, 12:44 AM. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:16 am
Betty Boop Almost Lost Her Bling-Bling: Fleischer Studios v. [read post]
