Search for: "United States District Court for the District of Minnesota" Results 921 - 940 of 1,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm by Jeffrey May
” Defendants would be permitted to petition the United States for permission to continue to participate in the JOE. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm by Jeffrey May
Department of Justice and the State of New York filed a complaint today in the federal district court in Washington, D.C. against Verizon and four of the nation’s largest cable companies—Comcast Corporation, Time Warner Cable Inc., Bright House Networks, LLC, and Cox Communications, Inc. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 7:27 am by Ed Wallis
We are offering free case evaluations to the general public across the United States and Canada. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:35 am by Erica Gann Kitaev
Tunheim of the District Court of Minnesota preliminarily approved a settlement in a class action brought under the VPPA against Blockbuster in Missaghi v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Michael Burleigh
., the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ruled that Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Section 12(g)”) does not provide a private right of action. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 11:47 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 104665 (D MN, July 27, 2012), a Minnesota federal district court, adopting a magistrate's recommendations as to this part of the case (2012 U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:48 pm
This month’s debacle comes out of the great state of Minnesota, where the drug testing process has come under fire. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
The Buncombe County District Attorney filed a motion to compel the state to turn over information about the failed exams. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:11 am by Matthew Salzwedel
The Minnesota Supreme Court uses full justification, but the Minnesota Court of Appeals and federal district courts are mixed. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am by Conor McEvily
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:58 am by Joe Kristan
United States; USDC-AZ No. 2:09-cv-01284 Prior coverage: IRS fighting demutualization holding in another venue IRS LOSES DEMUTUALIZATION ARGUMENT IN COURT OF CLAIMS Demutualization: what to do now? [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:06 pm
The Commission filed its securities fraud complaint against the registered futures commission merchant in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:05 am by Jonathan F. Tabasky
Hebrew National Hot Dogs may answer to a Higher Authority, but for the time being they’ll also be answering to the United States District Court of Minnesota. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm by Joel R. Brandes
From November 2002 to July 2006, Anne and Ricardo lived together in the United States in the states of Minnesota and Wisconsin. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:10 am
A district court judge ruled in March 2011 that the code contained errors but that it didn’t cause inaccuracies in test results. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:22 am by admin
A recent example of a check kiting scheme is the guilty verdict against George Leslie Wintz, Jr. in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 4:00 am by Seth Leventhal
This week, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota has put out some proposed rule changes (more specifically the Federal Practice Committee, headed by Jeannine Lee of the Leonard Street law firm). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:08 am by Steve Baird
Thanks to District Court Judge Joan Ericksen of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, next week NeoCon attendees will be able to see and experience both SEEYOND and BEYOND products, without likely confusion, when she confirmed last week in a written order her previous oral denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Verscene Inc. and Seeyond Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm by admin
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA “The evidence in the record does not compel findings contrary to those made by USCIS. [read post]