Search for: "United States v. California" Results 921 - 940 of 13,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
  In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm by The Complex Litigator
United States District Court Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz (Southern District of California) certified a class of newspaper home delivery carriers classified as independent contractors by Lee Publications, Inc. but alleging their status as employees of Lee Publications. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
On June 1, President Trump spoke to governors and the public about deploying the military within the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
By Matthew Hinks The well-known "nexus" and "rough proportionality" tests from the United States Supreme Court's opinions in Nollan v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:28 pm by Heidi Meinzer
I will keep watching to see if this case is appealed to the United States Supreme Court, and will keep you posted! [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 8:32 am by Amanda M. Sample and Ellen T. Berge
Last month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California attempted to tackle these questions in response to a motion to dismiss in Della v. [read post]
  While that decision may well be challenged before the California Supreme Court, it only underscores how California employees have an avenue to try to avoid the impact of United States Supreme Court decisions regarding class actions – PAGA claims. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:48 pm by John Floyd
This definition is drawn from Section 16 of Title 18 of the United States Code. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Millett will argue on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of California. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December  in In Re United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Native American Rights Fund
State of California (Gaming Compact; Good Faith Negotiations; Land Into Trust)Sorace v. [read post]
Houston, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, held that borrowers are not intended third-party beneficiaries of the Servicer Participation Agreement and, therefore, lack standing to sue for an alleged breach of the agreement.Benito v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 12:10 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission, the California Supreme Court will decide the following issues: (1) Under the state Constitution (Cal. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 8:14 pm by Michael O'Hear
 The state’s most prominent victims’ organization, Crime Victims United of California, was quick to condemn the decision and predict the worst for public safety. [read post]