Search for: "United States v. He" Results 921 - 940 of 48,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner did not visit the Children after he left the United States in July 2010 and before he filed the Petition. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:37 am by Tun-Jen Chiang
United States was a much-watched case on whether Congress's failure to give promised pay raises violates the Constitution's protection for judicial renumeration. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:32 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s an order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California allowing other aspects of the Martin v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 9:35 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, October 7, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries: Worker Taxed Thousands for Social Security Disability Benefits He Never Received, June 21, 2016, Boston SSDI Lawyer Blog The post Harvey v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix Chambers.
Mr H’s older daughter (J) by another woman accused him of sexual abuse when he was resident in the United States after which he and the child’s mother took the child to the UK. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:34 pm
He left work in 2008 and had not worked since that time, when he applied for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) with the United States Social Security Administration (SSA). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 10:45 pm
Colvin, a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, deals with the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program run by the United States Social Security Administration (SSA). [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
He stated this appeal concerns situations covered by TULCRA but falling outside EU law, so the USA cannot rely on EU law as entitling it to protection from discrimination. [read post]