Search for: "United States v. Howard" Results 921 - 940 of 1,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am by Susan Brenner
  These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:45 am by INFORRM
The appeal in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters Ltd has now been listed to be heard on 28 or 29 June 2017. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
Hunt Transp    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0175n.06 Howard v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
” In other words, he thought Sure-Tan required the court to reconcile the NLRA and immigration law by excluding from NLRA coverage anyone who could not legally be hired in the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:03 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In it Brandeis enunciated the view he later echoed in the Supreme Court case of Olmstead v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am by Erin Miller
Discussion of the Citizens United decision continues. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
One of those dots is Chief Justice John Marshall’s 1809 opinion in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, which asks whether SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause, and Lagos v. [read post]