Search for: "United States v. Judge"
Results 921 - 940
of 31,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2018, 8:41 am
The post Reactionary Judges, Kavanaugh, and Eugene V. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:59 am
The United States Social Security Administration (SSA) oversees the SSI program. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 6:15 pm
United States: According to the dissent from denial of en banc review, the three-judge panel's opinion in this case (also issued today) "injects serious, untoward obstacles to the exercise of the very sentencing discretion by the district courts that Booker was intended to revive. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United State provides as follows: §3. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United State provides as follows: §3. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 7:33 am
Balboa.The military judge in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 9:35 am
In Harvey v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 10:31 am
I really appreciate the care Judge Lauck put... [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:03 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:13 pm
Gayle, 142 F.Supp 707, a ruling later upheld by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:04 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:39 am
The Judicial Conference of the United States did adopt a version of the Model Code, the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:19 pm
Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 11:49 am
Colvin, February 25, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 11:08 am
And when it comes to immigrating to the United States, that distinction makes all the difference. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 9:53 pm
Reaching in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:40 pm
The petition also noted that the dissenting judges in the state Supreme Court had protested that all of the rationales used by the majority to strike down the state law had already been considered and rejected by the Supreme Court in its Citizens United ruling. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:05 pm
United States v Requena, 980 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. [read post]